[FASTCGI] Apache mod_fastcgi 2.4.6 is stable?

Matt Marcella mattmarcella at passur.com
Mon Apr 6 15:40:41 EDT 2009


fastcgi has been working well for me for 10 years. I have used in in 
critical apps for brokerage firms , and for aviation companies
I think it works well for people so there has been little need for change.

Matt

German Gutierrez wrote:
> Thanks, i'm going to check mod_fcgid
>
> Germán Gutiérrez
>
> 2009/4/6 Rasmus Andersson <rasmus at flajm.com <mailto:rasmus at flajm.com>>
>
>     On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 19:19, German Gutierrez
>     <german.gutierrez at tide.cl <mailto:german.gutierrez at tide.cl>> wrote:
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > I want deploy a python app in apache with mod_fastcgi, but this
>     module has
>     > not changes since november 2007. This means no bugs or not support?
>
>     There is no such thing as "no bugs" ;). But I'd call it "stable and
>     tested". You should also be aware of the mod_fcgid
>     http://fastcgi.coremail.cn/
>
>     >
>     > Germán Gutiérrez
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > FastCGI-developers mailing list
>     > FastCGI-developers at mailman.fastcgi.com
>     <mailto:FastCGI-developers at mailman.fastcgi.com>
>     > http://mailman.pins.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/fastcgi-developers
>     >
>     >
>
>
>
>     --
>     Rasmus Andersson
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> FastCGI-developers mailing list
> FastCGI-developers at mailman.fastcgi.com
> http://mailman.pins.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/fastcgi-developers
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.pins.net/mailman/private.cgi/fastcgi-developers/attachments/20090406/49e97efe/attachment.html>


More information about the FastCGI-developers mailing list