[FASTCGI] FastCGI still a smart choice in 2010?
andylin02
andylin02 at qq.com
Wed Apr 21 05:14:48 EDT 2010
all,
I am staring fast-cgi
I think I love it.
------------------
andylin
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Jon Ribbens"<jon+fastcgi-developers at unequivocal.co.uk>;
Date: Wed, Apr 21, 2010 04:47 PM
To: "Gordon Colburn"<gordon at group309.com>;
Cc: "fastcgi-developers"<fastcgi-developers at mailman.fastcgi.com>;
Subject: Re: [FASTCGI] FastCGI still a smart choice in 2010?
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:06:44PM -0400, Gordon Colburn wrote:
> However, fastcgi is still commonly used to deploy PHP apps; on Apache,
> fastcgi is arguably a more scalable technique for deploying PHP than is
> mod_php. And, fastcgi is a great way to deploy C/C++ web applications, IMO.
It's great for Python too - Python can have quite a slow start-up
time, so keeping the process running is great. There are several
Python FastCGI libraries, including one that I wrote (jonpy).
_______________________________________________
FastCGI-developers mailing list
FastCGI-developers at mailman.fastcgi.com
http://mailman.pins.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/fastcgi-developers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.pins.net/mailman/private.cgi/fastcgi-developers/attachments/20100421/4996c803/attachment.html>
More information about the FastCGI-developers
mailing list