[FASTCGI] FastCGI still a smart choice in 2010?

andylin02 andylin02 at qq.com
Wed Apr 21 05:14:48 EDT 2010


all,
 I am staring fast-cgi
 I think I love it.

  
  ------------------
  andylin


 
 
  
   
  
  ------------------ Original ------------------
  From:  "Jon Ribbens"<jon+fastcgi-developers at unequivocal.co.uk>;
 Date:  Wed, Apr 21, 2010 04:47 PM
 To:  "Gordon Colburn"<gordon at group309.com>; 
 Cc:  "fastcgi-developers"<fastcgi-developers at mailman.fastcgi.com>; 
 Subject:  Re: [FASTCGI] FastCGI still a smart choice in 2010?

  
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:06:44PM -0400, Gordon Colburn wrote:
> However, fastcgi is still commonly used to deploy PHP apps; on Apache,
> fastcgi is arguably a more scalable technique for deploying PHP than is
> mod_php. And, fastcgi is a great way to deploy C/C++ web applications, IMO.

It's great for Python too - Python can have quite a slow start-up
time, so keeping the process running is great. There are several
Python FastCGI libraries, including one that I wrote (jonpy).
_______________________________________________
FastCGI-developers mailing list
FastCGI-developers at mailman.fastcgi.com
http://mailman.pins.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/fastcgi-developers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.pins.net/mailman/private.cgi/fastcgi-developers/attachments/20100421/4996c803/attachment.html>


More information about the FastCGI-developers mailing list