Re: authorizer??

• In context of messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Paul Mahoney: "Re: FCGI and Apache ... on SCO Enterprise System Release 5"
• Previous message: Brian P Millett: "authorizer??"
• In reply to: Brian P Millett: "authorizer??"

Message-Id: <199605171825.OAA04837@breckenridge.openmarket.com>
To: bpm@techapp.com
Subject: Re: authorizer?? 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 May 1996 10:47:56 CDT."
             <199605171547.KAA05612@vlad> 
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 14:25:14 -0400
From: Mark Brown <mbrown@OpenMarket.com>


    I've read the docs about setting a fcgi role to be an authorizer
    by setting an AuthorizeRegion flag in the server config file.  Is this
    possible on the ncsa server?  I rewrote tiny-authorizer in perl and
    found that the tiny-perl-authorizer & tiny-authorizer are not
    receiving the REMOTE_USER or REMOTE_PASSWD variables.  Is this because
    I have not made the httpd server send the correct role?  How do I do
    this?

The NCSA server does not implement the Authorizer role at this
time, and neither does the Apache module; perhaps someone will
contribute an implementation.

The docs that mention the AuthorizeRegion directive are specific
to the Open Market server.

Thanks for the Monty Python example!

    --mark

• Next message: Paul Mahoney: "Re: FCGI and Apache ... on SCO Enterprise System Release 5"
• Previous message: Brian P Millett: "authorizer??"
• In reply to: Brian P Millett: "authorizer??"